Bullshattuck Feeds

  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Add to Google

Ads on Bullshattuck

  • Blogarama - The Blog Directory
  • Humor Blogs -  Blog Catalog Blog Directory
  • Add to Technorati Favorites
  • Blog Flux Directory
  • Humor Blogs - Blog Top Sites

B.S. & Environment

What a Lovely Inversion

(This article was published in the
February 22nd, 2008 issue of the The Daily Utah Chronicle)



“In the future, the air will become so polluted, that no one will be able to exercise outside, and old people and babies will be warned to not even go outside at all, out of fear that they may turn into a pillar of dust and/or Joan Rivers.” says the Soothsayer.

“But creepy Uncle Soothsayer,” say the children, “we don’t plan on living in Los Angeles when we’re older. We’re going to live in Salt Lake City.”

“Good luck.” says the Soothsayer.

Happy Winter! Dress warm, so that you don’t freeze. Wash your hands, so that you don’t get the flu. Don’t go outside, so that you don’t develop respiratory problems. For those of you who don’t have the privilege of living in the Bowl Of Pea Soup that we call the Salt Lake Valley, every winter the valley develops an ‘inversion,’ in which air particles from factory emissions, car exhaust, pollutants, family style buffet restaurants, and just smog in general get trapped between the mountains that make up the valley. Last year’s inversion was one of the worst we’ve had in quite some time, and this year doesn’t promise to be any better. Why does it appear as though the inversion becomes increasingly worse every year? There are always a couple of theories:

Is it because of global warming?
Is it because of the wrath of God?
Is it because of the over-industrialization of modern society and increase in automobiles on the road?

It could be a combination of all three. It could be none of the above. I don’t entirely know, as my background in science consists of mixing baking soda, vinegar, and still not entirely understanding where babies come from. If I were a scientist and the fate of the Salt Lake Valley somehow rested on my shoulders, our most advanced tools would be sticks and we would groom each other’s hair for breakfast. Despite my lack of scientific knowledge, I couldn’t help but feel apprehensive when I read of the ‘red alert’ in the Salt Lake Tribune a few days ago, which warns of the following:

“The Utah Department of Air Quality today issued a “Red” air action alert for the Wasatch and the Cache Valley, thanks to a buildup of high pressure over Utah . . . Under such advisories, sensitive people, particularly children and the elderly, should reduce prolonged or heavy exertion outdoors. And all wood burning is prohibited”

I suppose my annual ‘Adopt a Grandparent From a Retirement Home and Take Them to a Bonfire’ Day will have to be canceled.

Inversion is funny! No, not entirely. It’s genuinely something to beware of, and it’s rather sad that we now live in a time in which, for several days every winter, we’re actually told to not go outside. We don’t stay indoors when it rains. We don’t stay indoors when it snows. We are told however, to limit being outside during the inversion. We are now managed by what days the government tells us are ‘red’ days and ‘inversion’ days and ‘unsafe’ days and ‘you may as well take up smoking’ days.

Sure, Salt Lake City may not have reached Los Angeles-esque levels yet, and we certainly haven’t had anything similar to The Great Smog that killed several thousands of people in London in 1952. Nevertheless, it’s a terrifying thing to think that these comparisons are even being used at all. The comparison alone is lethal.

Granted, temperature inversion is something that already exists in the natural world. It’s a phenomenon that appears in valleys untouched by humans all over the world. Regardless, I don’t think that Mother Nature intended for pea soup fog to have a crunchy, brown topping. Being a non-scientist, I’d like to assume that the recent levels of inversion are something that doesn’t occur naturally. This is rather aggravating, for the inversion often affects those who don’t play as big of a part in actually causing the inversion. It’s ironic that on severe inversion days, it is requested by the public that they take public transportation instead of driving. While this would be good advice before the inversion occurs, who’s willing to wait outside for a public bus or wait outside for a public train?

Oh I’m sorry, have you already died? Let me go ahead and treat that bullet wound you were complaining about.

Until winter is over, I suppose I’ll just put up with the inversion and risk foul smelling air and poor health. I’ll continue to hold my breath while waiting for TRAX. And while jogging outside. And while developing a fungus along the inner dining room of my lungs. Either that, or move from the mountain skies to a city that has cleaner air.

I hear that downtown Los Angeles is nice.

Our Society Promotes Waste

(This article was published in the
October 4th, 2007 issue of the The Daily Utah Chronicle)



The following is a true story about a toilet. Any attempts to engage the reader using "crass potty humor" are intentional, but are not to be shared in mixed company.

I used a public toilet a few days ago. I won't mention where this particular toilet is located to protect the privacy of the individual who occupied the toilet before me (in addition to not actually knowing the identity of the toilet-using individual). Needless to say, when I approached the aforementioned toilet, I found that it was, in fact, filled with enough toilet paper to choke a horse -- assuming a horse, for whatever odd reason, chose to eat a lot of toilet paper. Fortunately, there was a toilet plunger to the side of this toilet. Toilet was plunged, toilet paper (etc.) was flushed, and all was right in the world. It was at this point that I asked myself:

Why do some people use so much toilet paper?

Everyone's been familiar with recycling for decades. The word "recycling" is older than Phyllis Diller, who, as it turns out, is nearly ready to be recycled herself. Many people over the years have trained us how to recycle. Our freshman roommates taught us to not throw away glass bottles but to stack them in our window.

Lagoon taught us to not throw away Coke cans but to bring them in to save 74 cents. Al Gore taught us to not throw away our votes on Ralph Nader but to buy his PowerPoint on DVD years later. Everyone's familiar with recycling. What if, however, we didn't have as much to recycle? What if we didn't waste as much in the first place?

Not much is actually said about consumer waste. It's often recommended that the public reuse and recycle. To suggest, though, that the public actually cut back on consumer waste is to be accused of being just a magenta-shade away from being a communist. "Consuming and wasting is our American God-given right!" we proudly proclaim.

Proposing that the public cut back on consumer waste won't win a politician votes. It won't give a businessman box seats at a Jazz game, and it won't award Main Street USA a lucrative deal to build Wal-Mart in its backyard. This utter disregard for any sense of self-control when it comes to consumer waste is a battle cry drifting through the air. In fact, if one holds up an empty plastic cup from Taco Bell to one's ear and faces the wind, a whisper can almost be heard:

"Indulge, gratify and spoil! Take what you will, it will all be reused in the end! Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow, we can probably recycle our crap (or not, the choice is yours)!"

Everyone knows the United States is No. 1 in the world -- whether we be No. 1 in patriotic independence and civil freedoms or No. 1 in reality shows featuring dancing Joey Fatone. Sadly, the United States also leads the world in most trash produced, at 236 million tons a year or about 4.6 pounds per person each day. At this rate, I throw away my weight's worth in trash every month (or a month and a half during the holidays).

A photographer named Chris Jordan was so interested in the phenomenon of consumer waste that it inspired his most recent collection titled "Running the Numbers: An American Self-Portrait." The series of photographs, which can be viewed online at www.chrisjordan.com, breaks down unfathomable numbers of consumer waste into easy-to-understand, bite-sized images.

It's one thing to hear "two million plastic bottles are used in the U.S. every five minutes." It's quite another to see a picture of the two million plastic bottles.

Being a self-proclaimed technophile, one of the photographs I found of interest was one that depicted the 426,000 cell phones that are retired in the United States every day. I found this photograph of interest, as I've owned nine cell phones in the past five years. Unfortunately, I have no joke to follow the previous candid statement. I've owned nine cell phones in the past five years.

Everyone is entitled to indulge in their own pursuit of happiness, regardless of the path they choose. Is it necessary, however, that the pursuit of such happiness bring with it such a level of Trump-esque overindulgence? Do we really need another cell phone? Must we double-bag that gallon of milk as if it were a set of Russian nesting dolls? Are 100 photocopies of our butt cheeks even necessary?

Recycling is good for the environment, yadda yadda yadda, but perhaps simply having self-control and first reducing our consumer waste might not only be easier to do, but leave a more positive impact on society and the environment.

At the very least, it might leave a positive impact on whoever uses the bathroom stall after us.